123123Preloader23

An Interwoven Tapestry

The Journey of the PPECB

2024/2025 Year in Review

Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) Compliance

Empowerdex

1. B-BBEE Compliance Performance Information

The PPECB’s compliance report in terms of section 13G(1) of the Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) Act 46 of 2013, read with section 12(1) of the B-BBEE Regulations of 2016 and B-BBEE Explanatory Notice 01 of 2018 is detailed below.

As contained in the annual report guide for Schedule 3A and 3C public entities, the PPECB has applied the relevant Code of Good Practice in the following manner:

CRITERIARESPONSE (YES/NO)DISCUSSION
Determining qualification criteria for the issuing of licences, concession, or
other authorisations in respect of economic activity in terms of any law?
NoNot applicable
Developing and implementing a preferential procurement policy?YesThe PPECB complies with the Preferential Procurement
Regulation of 2022
Determining qualification criteria for state-owned enterprises?NoNot applicable
Determining qualification criteria for entering into partnerships with the
private sector?
NoAny public private partnership (PPP) that the PPECB may
enter into will be in line with the Treasury Regulations
Determining criteria for the awarding of incentives, grants, and investment
schemes in support of Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment?
NoHowever, three of the indicators under Programme 4
addresses the issue of capacitating black/historically
disadvantaged individuals
Note: The PPECB has submitted the required information by the appointed independent economic empowerment rating agency, however, at the time of reporting, the agency is yet to finalise the new B-BBEE certificate and scorecard. The current verification report is provided on the following page.

2. Irregular Expenditure

Figures in Rand20252024
Opening balance--
Prior period errors--
Add: Irregular expenditure confirmed22 553679 380
Less: Irregular expenditure not condoned and removed(22 553)(679 380)
Closing balance--

Irregular expenditure 2025:

There were two instances of irregular expenditure. In the first instance, the three-quote procurement process was not followed and prior approval from the Chief Financial Officer was not obtained. In the second instance the entity continued to use rental services of a service provider whose contract expired.

Irregular expenditure 2024:

There were seven instances of irregular expenditure. The three-quote procurement process was not followed in three instances and prior approval from the Chief Financial Officer was not obtained. There were three instances where the entity continued to use service providers when the contracts had expired and in one instance the entity directly approached one supplier, and the threshold limits were not adhered to.

Reconciling notes to the annual financial statement disclosure20252024
Irregular expenditure for the current year22 553679 380
Total22 553679 380
Details of current and previous year irregular expenditure removed - (not condoned)20252024
Irregular expenditure NOT condoned and removed22 553679 380
Total22 553679 380

Irregular expenditure was approved by the Board after the year-end.

3. FRUITLESS AND WASTEFUL EXPENDITURE

Figures in Rand

Figures in Rand20252024
Opening balance--
Add: Fruitless and wasteful expenditure confirmed2 245 652139 475
Less: Fruitless and wasteful expenditure written off(2 245 652)(139 475)
Less: Frruitless and wasteful expenditure recoverable--
Closing balance--

Fruitless and wasteful expenditure 2025:

There were three instances of fruitless and wasteful expenditure. In the first instance, a VAT payment to the South African Revenue Services was deemed to be paid late and penalty and interest charged of R2,160,783. The matter is being disputed however to prevent further interest being charged, the penalty and interest payment was made. In the second instance, an employee’s laptop was damaged through negligence and her employment contract terminated prior to the investigation being concluded. There were insufficient available funds to recover the full debt and R6,150 was irrecoverable. In the third instance, four laptops were stolen and the investigations conducted could not determine how or by whom the laptops were stolen. An amount of R78,719 was irrecoverable.

Fruitless and wasteful expenditure 2024:

There were three instances of fruitless and wasteful expenditure. In the first instance a terminated employee continued to receive a
salary. In the second instance a prospective employee was paid a salary but not subsequently employed. In the third instance, bursaries
provided to an employee was not recovered in full upon her resignation
Reconciling notes to the annual financial statement disclosure 20252024
Fruitless and wasteful expenditure for the current year2 245 652139 475
Total2 245 652139 475
Details of current and previous year fruitless and wasteful expenditure not recoverable and written off20252024
Fruitless and wasteful expenditure not recoverable and written off2 245 652139 475
Total2 245 652139 475

4. Inter-Institutional Matters

4.1 There were no non-compliance cases where the institution is involved in an inter-institutional arrangement (where such institution is not responsible for the non-compliance).
4.2 There were no non-compliance cases where the institution is involved in an inter-institutional arrangement (where such institution is responsible for the non-compliance).

5. LATE AND/OR NON-PAYMENT OF SUPPLIERS

The PPECB did not have non-payment of suppliers for the period under review. Payments were made in accordance with agreed upon negotiated terms.

6. INFORMATION ON SUPPLIER CHAIN MANAGEMENT

6.1 PROCUREMENT BY OTHER MEANS

NoName of SupplierReason for procurement by other meansValue of contract
1Whistle Blowers (Pty) LtdDeviation from the competitive procurement process for training in respect of the PPECB ethics hotline.7 763
2NST Beleggings 013 BKDeviation from the competitive procurement process due to a non-responsive RFQ process for Groblersdal office rental.780 180
3Van Eeden Geboue (Pty) LtdDeviation from the competitive procurement process due to a non-responsive RFQ process for Ceres office rental.2 968 679
4Gaby GessDeviation from the competitive procurement process due to impracticality.498 336
5Marcus EvansDeviation from the competitive procurement process for attendance to an online governance risk & compliance conference.15 520
6Satinsky 105 Travellers RestDeviation from the competitive procurement process due to a non-responsive RFQ process for Clanwilliam office rental.480 649
7Parvest Pty) LtdDeviation from the competitive procurement process due to a non-responsive RFQ process for Montague Gardens Office rental.3 980 454
8Erven 481 & 171 Tzaneen (EDMS) BKDeviation from the competitive procurement process due to a non-responsive RFQ process for Tzaneen Office rental.1 946 424
9Augpad Koelkamers (Pty) LtdDeviation from the competitive procurement process due to alternative office space being limited in the Augrabies area.191 771
10Joseph Kalango, subcontracted Architect by ConsultmechDeviation for appointment of a third party to finalise basement occupancy certificate project due to impracticality.26 000
11Microsep (Pty) LtdDeviation for procurement of Multi Fluorescence Detector Waters 2475 unit for the Alliance HPLC.538 235
12JT Ross Property GroupDeviation from the competitive procurement process due to a non-responsive RFQ process for Durban Office rental.5 755 720
13Maserumule AttorneysDeviation from the competitive procurement process for continued rendering of professional services to the Board.31 660
14Nieuwoudia Droomland
(Pty) Ltd
Deviation from the competitive procurement process due to alternative office space being limited in the Augrabies area.1 166 874
15ITEC (SA)Deviation from the competitive procurement process to ensure business continuity with no business disruption and continued M-Files licensing and support.1 897 209
16Maserumule AttorneysDeviation from the competitive procurement process for continued rendering of professional services to the Board.35 650
6.2 CONTRACT EXTENSIONS AND VARIATIONS
NoName of SupplierReason for expansion or variation of contractOriginal contract valueValue of contract expansion or variation of contractValue of previous contract expansion or variation of contract
1KMHT Properties
Investments CC
Variation of the contract value for the rental of office space476 64099 300-
2CRS TechnologiesVariation of the contract value for the integration to Oracle - compensation module672 00083 600-
3Erven 481 & 171
Tzaneen (EDMS) BK
Extension/Variation of current lease to allow sufficient time for competitive
tender process.
959 694146 775-
4NASDAQ Corporate
Solutions
International Limited
Variation of current contract for an additional license629 69420 990-
5Altron KarabinaExpanded time and scope to accommodate critical functional and business
requirements
25 767 13029 9468 325 043
6Clifford MartinVariation of contract - assessment of entity readiness to new ERP and
Business as Usual
884 50029 000-
7Ricoh (South Africa)Extension of managed printing services to allow sufficient time for entity
determine business needs
6 030 9572 150 2002 786 553
8Rentokil InitialExtension of Hygiene Services for Regional Offices415 275103 115-
9PKF Cape Town
Incorporated
Variation and expansion of scope due to additional external audit work
conducted
4 290 650759 725-
10Dreamsmith
Marketing (Pty) Ltd
Variation to support reports on entity website323 88629 220-
11Akili IT ServicesVariation to include migration of entity intranet to Sharepoint Online736 440287 500357 390
12Microsoft Ireland
Operations Ltd
Variation to include additional dataverse storage on the Enterprise
agreement
59 020 0497 469 326-
13Oracle Corporation
(South Africa)
Variation due to the extension of the test environment32 989 60936 9733 558 394
14Experiential Technologies (Pty) LtdAmended extension of contract date. No additional financial implications
as budget unspent to date.
640 000--